Legislature(2013 - 2014)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/01/2014 08:30 AM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB278 | |
| HB127 | |
| HB21 | |
| HB127 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 278 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 21 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 127 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE FINANCE COMMITTEE
April 1, 2014
8:38 a.m.
8:38:41 AM
CALL TO ORDER
Co-Chair Stoltze called the House Finance Committee meeting
to order at 8:38 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Alan Austerman, Co-Chair
Representative Bill Stoltze, Co-Chair
Representative Mark Neuman, Vice-Chair
Representative Mia Costello
Representative Bryce Edgmon
Representative Les Gara
Representative David Guttenberg
Representative Lindsey Holmes
Representative Cathy Munoz
Representative Steve Thompson
Representative Tammie Wilson
MEMBERS ABSENT
None
ALSO PRESENT
Daniel George, Staff, Representative Bill Stoltze; Andy
Mills, Special Assistant to the Commissioner, Department of
Administration.
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE
Linda Lord-Jenkins, State Ombudsman, Anchorage; Beth
Leibowitz, Office of Ombudsman, Juneau.
SUMMARY
HB 21 FOUR-DAY SCHOOL WEEK
CSHB 21(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with
no recommendation and with one new zero fiscal
note from the Department of Education and Early
Development and one new zero fiscal note from the
Department of Administration.
HB 127 OMBUDSMAN
CSHB 127 (JUD) was REPORTED out of committee with
a "do pass" recommendation and with two new zero
fiscal notes from the Department of
Administration, one new zero fiscal note from the
Legislature and one new zero fiscal note from the
Department of Corrections.
HB 278 EDUCATION: FUNDING/TAX CREDITS/PROGRAMS
HB 278 was HEARD and HELD in committee for
further consideration.
HOUSE BILL NO. 278
"An Act increasing the base student allocation used in
the formula for state funding of public education;
repealing the secondary student competency examination
and related requirements; relating to high school
course credit earned through assessment; relating to a
college and career readiness assessment for secondary
students; relating to charter school application
appeals and program budgets; relating to residential
school applications; increasing the stipend for
boarding school students; extending unemployment
contributions for the Alaska technical and vocational
education program; relating to earning high school
credit for completion of vocational education courses
offered by institutions receiving technical and
vocational education program funding; relating to
education tax credits; making conforming amendments;
and providing for an effective date."
8:38:59 AM
Vice-Chair Neuman MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee
substitute for HB 278, Work Draft 28-GH2716\G, (Mischel,
3/31/14). Co-Chair Stoltze OBJECTED for discussion.
DANIEL GEORGE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE BILL STOLTZE,
discussed the work draft. He stated that version G replaced
version N. He provided a sectional analysis. He began with
section 1 where the governor's language was reinstated
related to an opportunity to challenge for credit. He noted
that sections 2, 3, and 4 reinserted provisions of existing
statutes related to the high school graduation qualifying
exam.
8:41:28 AM
Mr. George continued with section 5, page 5, lines 29-30,
which created an opportunity for charter school applicants
to further appeal within 30 days to the state Board of
Education and Early Development. Section 5, page 6, lines
6-8 related to a situation where a local school board that
denied an application for a charter school, which was
subsequently approved by the state board on appeal could
operate the charter school. The section also removed a
former subsection stating that the state board would
operate a charter school as if the state board were a
school district.
Mr. George continued with section 6, page 6; lines 18-26
were added regarding charter school application appeals and
timelines. He moved to section 7, page 7; lines 3-5 were
amended to clarify that if the school district required
lease payments by a charter school the district would
negotiate a lease agreement with the charter school for an
amount that did not exceed the true operational costs
calculated.
8:42:42 AM
Mr. George discussed section 8, page 7, where lines 12-14
were added to specify that a local school board shall
provide a charter school with a report itemizing
administrate costs retained by the local school board.
Section 11, page 8, line 23 through page 9, line 7 inserted
a new duty for the Board of Education and Early Development
to report to the legislature recommendations for changes in
the method of education spending by the state and school
districts that resulted in improved efficiencies and in
administration of public education in the state. He noted
the removal of three sections: a section relating to school
bond reimbursement program, a section relating to boarding
school stipends and a section relating to student counts
for charter schools.
Co-Chair Stoltze added "it keeps them in without the
increase."
Mr. George continued with section 15; lines 21-27 were
added relating to the public education fund and
appropriations for the Teachers Retirement System (TRS). He
continued with section 16, page 11, line 28 through page
14, line 3, which was inserted and related to unfunded
liability and the teachers retirement cost adjustment. He
noted page 14, line 1 included a change in the required
local contribution from 45 percent to 40 percent of a
district's basic need. Section 17, page 14, line 4-19
amended the school size table for purposes of calculating a
schools Average Daily Membership (ADM) to determine state
aide.
Mr. George continued with sections 18, 19 and 20 on page
14; lines 20-28 were amended to reflect an increase in the
Base Student Allocation (BSA) by $100 in addition to that
of the governor's plan in the first year. Section 21, page
14, line 29 through page 15, line 15 was inserted relating
to state aid to school districts and withholding for
purpose of deposit into the teachers retirement trust fund.
Sections 22, 23 and 24 on page 15, line 13 though page 16,
line 16 were inserted relating to altering teacher tenure
from 3 years to 5 years and subjecting tenure to review,
and regarding loss of tenure rights.
8:45:51 AM
Mr. George continued with sections 25, 26 and 27 on page 16
line 17 through page 17; line 19, which was inserted
relating to pension benefits and employer contribution
rates, transmitting funds for deposit in a teacher
retirement trust fund and additional state contributions
and the teacher's pension reserve fund. Section 28, page
17, lines-22 and 27 and page 18 were amended to reflect a
three-year reauthorization of the Alaska Technical
Vocational Education Program (TVEP) program and the
allocations of TVEP funding present in existing statute.
Section 30 was removed from the bill including subsection
(h) relating to a 20 percent withholding penalty for
failure to comply with new TVEP requirements.
Mr. George continued with section 32; the option for a
municipality to adopt by ordinance a partial or whole tax
exemption for all or a portion of privately owned real
property, rented or leased for use as a charter school was
added. Sections 33, 34 and 35 relating to the
establishment, trusteeship and management of the teachers'
pension reserve fund and the duties of the Alaska
Retirement Management Board were inserted. He stated that
sections 36 through 46 related to the income tax education
credit, mining business education credit, fisheries
business education credit and fisheries resource landing
tax education credit. Three changes were made to the tax
credits, two of which were permanent and one of which would
sunset in 2021 along with other tax credits.
8:48:19 AM
Mr. George pointed out that section 48; page 33, line 25
relating to transfer or absorption of a federal agency
school and teachers was repealed. Section 50 was removed;
it included transition language related to the appeal of
the high school graduation qualifying exam. Applicability
language related to teacher tenure provisions in sections
22-24 was added. Section 51 addressed the effective date of
transition language related to charter school applications
filed with the local school board; it was amended from
September to July 1, 2014. Section 53 directed the
Department of Administration to present to the legislature
a written proposal to implement a salary and benefits
schedule for school districts. Sections 54 through 59
reflected the effective dates of various provisions of the
act; notably the effective date of the act was changed from
September to July 1, 2014.
8:49:53 AM
Co-Chair Stoltze WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered. Version G was ADOPTED. He
stated his intent for invited testimony related to some of
the legislation's key provisions. He invited a vigorous
amendment process.
Representative Munoz asked if the administration would
testify about the retirement portion of the CS.
Co-Chair Stoltze replied in the affirmative.
Representative Munoz requested invited testimony from the
university.
8:51:22 AM
Representative Gara asked if he could pose technical
questions related to the bill's provisions.
Co-Chair Stoltze denied Representative Gara's request.
8:51:47 AM
Vice-Chair Neuman requested a written list of the changes
made in the CS.
Co-Chair Stoltze agreed.
8:52:07 AM
AT EASE
8:52:18 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Stoltze noted the deadline for amendments of 5:00
pm.
8:53:00 AM
AT EASE
9:14:07 AM
RECONVENED
HOUSE BILL NO. 127
"An Act clarifying that the Alaska Bar Association is
an agency for purposes of investigations by the
ombudsman; relating to compensation of the ombudsman
and to employment of staff by the ombudsman under
personal service contracts; providing that certain
records of communications between the ombudsman and an
agency are not public records; relating to disclosure
by an agency to the ombudsman of communications
subject to attorney-client and attorney work-product
privileges; relating to informal and formal reports of
opinions and recommendations issued by the ombudsman;
relating to the privilege of the ombudsman not to
testify and creating a privilege under which the
ombudsman is not required to disclose certain
documents; relating to procedures for procurement by
the ombudsman; relating to the definition of 'agency'
for purposes of the Ombudsman Act and providing
jurisdiction of the ombudsman over persons providing
certain services to the state by contract; and
amending Rules 501 and 503, Alaska Rules of Evidence."
9:14:15 AM
Co-Chair Stoltze noted his successful effort in determining
a lack of objection to the legislation from the Office of
Victims' Rights.
Co-Chair Austerman informed the committee that the bill's
sponsor was the House Rules Committee by request. He
wondered who requested the legislation.
Co-Chair Stoltze replied that the Office of the Ombudsman
requested the bill.
9:15:16 AM
Representative Costello discussed the bill's four zero
fiscal notes.
Co-Chair Stoltze stated that the agency existed in the
legislature's budget.
Vice-Chair Neuman asked about page 2, lines 9 and 10. He
discussed the confidential negotiations with the Alaska
Gasline Development Corporation (AGDC). He asked if the
ombudsman's office would have access to the state agency's
records of the confidential hearings.
Co-Chair Stoltze replied that he did not know the answer.
Representative Thompson echoed the concerns of Vice-Chair
Neuman. He wondered if the agency's authority was too
broad.
Co-Chair Stoltze stated that he would hold the bill until
the concerns of the members could be alleviated.
[Note: Further discussion and action on CSHB 127 (JUD) can
be found later in this meeting.]
HOUSE BILL NO. 21
"An Act relating to the length of a school week; and
providing for an effective date."
9:19:18 AM
ANDY MILLS, SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE COMMISSIONER,
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, expressed his apology that
the fiscal note was not addressed in the committee's prior
hearing of HB 21.
Co-Chair Stoltze asked for further explanation of the
fiscal note.
Mr. Mills discussed the new fiscal note from Department of
Administration, Centralized Administrative Services. He
noted changes in the prior year's CS necessitating an
additional table. The change required reprogramming and
other changes at the Division of Retirement and Benefits.
He discussed the cost estimates listed in the fiscal note.
The reprogramming was related to communication between the
division and the federal government. He stated that the
Central Retirement System (CRS) was the system that allowed
for tracking of the retiree data for the division.
Calculation systems, found on the division's website
provided self-assessment tools that allowed employees to
track their retirement. Statements were delivered to the
members and brochures were sent to notify employees about
the change to the system.
9:22:31 AM
Vice-Chair Neuman wondered about the fiscal note's proposed
$100 thousand dollar expense. He stated that the Department
of Administration received approximately $100 million in
capital budget items related to Integrated Resources
Information Services (IRIS) upgrades. He asked whether the
changes needed for the legislation could be made with
already existing resources.
9:23:27 AM
Representative Costello asked about the state's approach to
programmers. She expressed confusion regarding the payment
of computer programmers already employed by the department.
Mr. Mills replied that certain programmers would absorb the
changes proposed in the fiscal note. The numbers were for
outside contracted costs. He stated that an alternate
schedule might seem simple, but the brochures were a fixed
cost.
9:25:37 AM
Representative Costello discussed her experience as a
teacher for Service High School. She wondered how the
employee hours could be translated into portions of the
year as outlined in the bill. She wondered if the
department could apply retirement benefits for a teacher
contracted for one-half of the year.
Mr. Mills replied that the schedule proposed in the bill
was an alternate schedule. He noted that utilization of the
uncodified code would have spawned multiple alternative
calendars. He suggested that further information be
provided by the division.
Representative Costello asked if the state moved from
hiring full-time to contractual programmers, would the
charge to the state change. She wondered why the practice
of contractual programmers was not utilized.
9:28:45 AM
Co-Chair Austerman commented that the state reduced the
number of days for a retiree from 172 to 150. He asked if
the change increased the retirement cost to the state. He
asked about the changes needed in the retirement system as
a result of the legislation.
Representative Wilson stated that the bill would not allow
for an employee's premature retirement. The shorter school
weeks would equal a full year of school.
Co-Chair Austerman noted that the days allowing for one
year's worth of retirement had changed.
Representative Wilson explained that fewer days were needed
because the days were longer.
Co-Chair Austerman did not understand the concept.
Co-Chair Stoltze understood that the teachers were
currently eligible for retirement and the changes in the
bill allowed that continuity of accrual despite the shorter
work/school weeks.
Co-Chair Austerman requested further understanding of the
cumulative effect of the legislation.
Co-Chair Stoltze asked Mr. Mills if he could envision an
addition of a new employee under the proposed calculation.
Mr. Mills assumed that a full year would lead to an
insignificant difference in time accrual.
9:31:55 AM
Representative Thompson stated dissatisfaction with the
fiscal note. He understood that the part-time teachers
worked a certain amount of days. He did not understand why
new statements would be required. He assumed that the cost
of the statements was built into the division's budget.
Mr. Mills replied that the fiscal note included a large
number of contractor costs. He noted that the fiscal note
would increase in its request if the entire change required
contractual programmers.
9:34:08 AM
Vice-Chair Neuman OFFERED a conceptual AMENDMENT to zero
out fiscal note one from the Department of Administration,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number 64. He MOVED
that the Department of Administration absorb the cost of
the changes proposed in the legislation.
Co-Chair Stoltze supported the change. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered. Fiscal note 1 from the
Department of Administration, OMB component number 64 was
changed to reflect ZERO fiscal impact.
Co-Chair Stoltze RESCINDED the prior action made to move
the bill out of committee. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered. CSHB 21 (FIN) was back before the committee.
9:36:17 AM
Representative Gara OFFERED a conceptual AMENDMENT. He
pointed to page 2, line 18, section C addressing the
reduction of school days and the provision of retirement
benefits. He stated that some school districts would reduce
school hours by 20 percent. He noted the minimum
instruction hours mandated by the legislation was 740 hours
for lower and 900 hours for higher grades. He noted that
many schools had greater than 1000 instructional hours.
Representative Gara discussed page 2, line 3 and the
commissioner's ability to reduce instructional days, as
long as instructional hours remained comparable. He stated
that the commissioner had reduced school days below 180
days in one community recently. The legislation reduced the
number of hours further. He expressed concern about cutting
the number of school hours.
Representative Gara MOVED the conceptual amendment to
retain page 2, line 18 through page 3, line 9.
Co-Chair Stoltze stated that the committee would not accept
such a conceptual amendment. He requested a written
amendment.
9:39:33 AM
Representative Costello appreciated Representative Gara's
point. She stated that the statute dictated minimum hours
constituting a day. School districts often exceeded the
requirements. She stated that the opportunity for shorter
days existed, yet districts chose not to take advantage.
She stated that the proposed legislation addressed
alternative schedules versus shorter teaching time. She
mentioned the concept of year-round school as another
option for an alternative schedule. She mentioned a study
in the committee members' packets related to improved
results in math and reading with alternative schedules. She
believed that the concept of minimum school hours per day
was already in statute and did not belong in the bill. She
stated that the policy call was unique and demanded an
opinion from the House Education Committee. She spoke about
the school board and public's involvement in all decisions
related to school week changes. The proposed legislation
was tied to the wishes of the parents and education
community. She opposed the conceptual amendment offered by
Representative Gara.
Representative Wilson stated that a school district could
choose a four-day school week without the proposed
legislation. She noted that the issue of teacher retirement
was the reason for the proposed legislation. Because the
teachers were working more days and hours in one district,
the full-years' worth of retirement was not accessible.
Upon the bill's inception, she asked the commissioner about
the constitution of a full work day. She opined that the
bill had flexibility without the amendment.
Co-Chair Stoltze stated that an amendment was not before
the committee.
Representative Munoz discussed Representative Costello's
reference to the report. She noted that in the report,
Montana shifted to a four-day week, but retained the 1000
hour requirement. She wondered why the bill shifted the
requirement in Alaska.
Representative Wilson replied that the hours in statute
were used to determine the bill's proposal. She stated that
each district used a different number of total hours. She
suggested that instituting one number for the entire state
might negatively impact some districts. She discussed the
issue with the commissioner and proposed that the problem
be addressed in a separate bill with a study about whether
an increase in hours would provide a better education for
Alaska's students.
Vice-Chair Neuman asked about page 2, lines 3-6 related to
the commissioner's approval of plans. He wondered why the
section was changed. He understood the local control issue,
but he opined that an alternative view from the
commissioner would prove advantageous.
9:46:57 AM
Representative Wilson stated that the commissioner would
review the plan with a checklist. The mechanism mandated
community meetings. She believed that the communities would
make the best judgments for their unique area needs. The
commissioner would approve the plans, based on the
checklist.
Vice-Chair Neuman asked for details about the checklist.
Representative Wilson stated that the community meeting
must address a plan for days/hours needed during the
shortened school week. The plan was then submitted to the
commissioner who reviewed it for necessary components. She
stated that outcomes were reviewed using standardized test
scores.
9:49:03 AM
Representative Gara opined that a problem arose in removing
the commissioner's discretion. He pointed to page 2, line
11, "if the school district shows that they are providing
the minimum of instruction" he stated that upon community
approval, the decision would be made. He stated that the
commissioner could allow for an alternative schedule under
current law. The commissioner was not amenable to a
reduction to 700 instructional hours. Current law retained
the districts with greater than statutory minimum
instructional hours. The bill mandated the commissioner's
approval of the statutory minimum following community
members' decision.
9:51:52 AM
Vice-Chair Neuman MOVED to REPORT CSHB 21 (FIN) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying revised fiscal notes. Representative Munoz
OBJECTED. She wished to see the amended fiscal note prior
to reporting out the bill.
Representative Gara apologized that he did not have a
written amendment.
9:53:07 AM
Representative Costello shared that her office worked
tirelessly reviewing hours of school days. She stated that
a school currently following state law would pay a large
organizational price for the proposed mandate. She urged
the legislature to revisit the issue of minimum
instructional hours. She cautioned the committee to review
all pertinent information before proposing a minimum number
of instructional hours to all Alaskan schools.
9:54:23 AM
Representative Gara apologized for not having his amendment
available in writing. He agreed with Representative
Costello and did not recommend that the committee mandate a
minimum number of instructional hours. He noted that the
commissioner currently decided the minimum number of
instructional hours based on his determination of an
adequate number of school hours to protect academic
achievement. He pointed to page 2, lines 3-6 indicating
that the commissioner could approve the number of days and
the number of instructional hours. The bill required an
acceptance of the school district's decision to instruct
for the minimum number of allowable hours. He disagreed
with the bill for that one reason. He wished to continue to
allow the commissioner to make the decision regarding the
minimum number of instructional hours for each individual
proposal.
9:56:12 AM
Representative Wilson stated that the commissioner would
not allow a four-day school week without the legislation.
She stated that the commissioner had denied all requests
for a four-day school week.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Holmes, Neuman, Thompson, Wilson, Costello,
Edgmon, Stoltze, Austerman
OPPOSED: Guttenberg, Munoz, Gara
The MOTION PASSED (8/3).
CSHB 21 (FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with no
recommendation and with one new zero fiscal note from the
Department of Education and Early Development and one new
zero fiscal note from the Department of Administration.
9:58:54 AM
HOUSE BILL NO. 127
"An Act clarifying that the Alaska Bar Association is
an agency for purposes of investigations by the
ombudsman; relating to compensation of the ombudsman
and to employment of staff by the ombudsman under
personal service contracts; providing that certain
records of communications between the ombudsman and an
agency are not public records; relating to disclosure
by an agency to the ombudsman of communications
subject to attorney-client and attorney work-product
privileges; relating to informal and formal reports of
opinions and recommendations issued by the ombudsman;
relating to the privilege of the ombudsman not to
testify and creating a privilege under which the
ombudsman is not required to disclose certain
documents; relating to procedures for procurement by
the ombudsman; relating to the definition of 'agency'
for purposes of the Ombudsman Act and providing
jurisdiction of the ombudsman over persons providing
certain services to the state by contract; and
amending Rules 501 and 503, Alaska Rules of Evidence."
10:00:56 AM
Co-Chair Stoltze discussed HB 127. He acknowledged that the
testifiers were online to speak about the bill.
LINDA LORD-JENKINS, STATE OMBUDSMAN, ANCHORAGE (via
teleconference), stated that she was available.
Vice-Chair Neuman asked about page 2, paragraph 4, section
3 related to records for every state agency.
Co-Chair Stoltze clarified that the bill stated "every
agency" as opposed to "every state agency."
Ms. Lord-Jenkins deferred the question to Ms. Leibowitz.
Co-Chair Stoltze requested an opinion about the policy's
intent from Ms. Lord-Jenkins.
Ms. Lord-Jenkins replied that the policy intended to have
the statute conform to other provisions allowing access to
information from investigated agencies. She noted that the
"state agency proviso" would limit the reach. She mentioned
other limited records that were not accessible.
10:03:53 AM
Vice-Chair Neuman asked which agencies were reviewed. He
wondered the scope of the ombudsman's abilities during a
complaint. He mentioned that some municipalities had
considered property taxes related to the gas line. He
wondered if a complaint from a municipality would yield the
ability for the ombudsman to review confidential gas line
materials.
Ms. Lord-Jenkins replied that the ombudsman had statutory
authority to review each agency of the state government
regarding the gas line issues and individual community
concerns. She admitted that her office was more apt to view
citizen complaints. She stated that individual communities
would be better rectified in a court of law. The ombudsman
could not force an agency to pay a fine or compensation to
an aggrieved party.
10:06:31 AM
Vice-Chair Neuman asked about the ombudsman's ability to
review terms by the Legislative Budget and Audit division.
He wondered if a complaint related to the appropriate
nature of building contracts could be reviewed by the
ombudsman.
Ms. Lord-Jenkins interpreted the statute to allow the
investigation of legislative agencies with the exemption of
the Office of Victims' Rights. She mentioned occasional
complaints related to legislative agencies and aides. She
interpreted that the ombudsman would have access to the
mentioned contracts as would the Legislative Council.
Vice-Chair Neuman referred to section 6, page 3 and "the
procedure shall be followed by the office in a
professional." He asked if the section referred to all
state agencies.
BETH LEIBOWITZ, OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN, JUNEAU (via
teleconference) requested question clarification. She
stated that section 6 addressed procurement for the
ombudsman office.
Vice-Chair Neuman understood. He asked about the authority
related to the terms "otherwise erroneous."
10:10:22 AM
Ms. Leibowitz replied that "otherwise erroneous" was a
catch-all category that was rarely used. She mentioned the
other appropriate terms related to complaints such as
"arbitrary, oppressive, unfair, and contrary to law."
Co-Chair Stoltze did not disagree with the bill. He opined
that the legislation included good policy provisions. He
noted that the fiscal notes were discussed earlier in the
meeting.
10:11:36 AM
Vice-Chair Neuman MOVED to REPORT CSHB 127 (JUD) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CSHB 127 (JUD) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with two new zero fiscal notes
from the Department of Administration, one new zero fiscal
note from the Legislature and one new zero fiscal note from
the Department of Corrections.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:12 a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 278 CS WORKDRAFT FIN 28-GH2716-G.pdf |
HFIN 4/1/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 278 |
| HB 278 Summary of Changes HB 278 - CS(FIN).pdf |
HFIN 4/1/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 278 |